At last The Law Society has grasped the nettle and issued proceedings. Something had to be done as a result of the extremely unfair circumstances that the contract awards created. Expert practitioner of lengthy experience, well regarded by their professional colleagues refused contracts, for what many thought insubstantial and invalid reasons.

The Law Society tells us that they are expecting a decision in due course. Watching the President address lawyers in Canada was interesting viewing, as she was at pains to point out that the Society had asked for JR not for solicitors but for the public. Whilst this is a very admirable standpoint, those of us who practice in publicly funded areas might have welcomed a more robust approach. No doubt, the issue has been thought out by those much cleverer than us, and every step is a carefully crafted path towards a successful outcome.

But what if it goes wrong?

What if the negotiations between The Law Society and LSC just bring more uncertainty for everyone? What happens to those who have contracts? Do we really think that the government is likely to back down on spending cuts in this day and age, even if the JR is successful.

Whilst this area of law is more compelling in the public consciousness than Crime ever was, you can't help wondering if it will all end up the same way.

No doubt we will shall see