Whitehall Court London v The Crown Estate Commissioners

A practical discussion of Whitehall Court London v The Crown Estate Commissioners and it's implications

  • 0 ratings, 45 users enrolled

Course Overview

This bite-size webinar provides an invaluable overview of Whitehall Court London Limited v The Crown Estate Commissioners (CEC) [2018], in which the Court of Appeal upheld the Upper Tribunal’s decision and found in favour of the CEC.


Whilst the scope of the assumption at paragraph 3(2)(b) of Schedule 13 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 has been raised in other cases, Whitehall Court London Limited v The Crown Estate Commissioners [2018] is the first reported case offering clarity that the assumption extends to the entire building – not just the tenant’s flat. To this end, the Court of Appeal’s judgment ensures that the rights of other qualifying tenants do no depress the value of the landlord’s interest.


Delivered by barrister Rachel Coyle of the 36 Group, this webinar is essential for anyone involved in leasehold and enfranchisement work.


In addition, this course will further explain the high-profile case of Mundy v Sloane Stanley Estate Trustees [2018], a long-running legal battle to slash leasehold costs, which threw the property industry’s calculation basis for extending a property’s lease into question.

What are the requirements?

  • Watch the recorded webinar and review the reference notes and optional evaluation form to test your legal knowledge.
  • This course provides 0.5 CPD points

Learning Outcomes

  • On completion of this course you will appreciate the clarity which this case Whitehall Court London Limited v The Crown Estate Commissioners provides leasehold and enfranchisement practitioners

What is the target audience?

  • Landlord and tenant practitioners of all levels

Collections

About Instructor - Rachel Coyle

Rachel is a specialist Civil Barrister at The 36 Group and enjoys a thriving practice in general civil and commercial work.

Rachel has been praised for her tenacity, determination and sound, thorough legal knowledge by clients, judges and opponents. She is committed to providing practical advice in a timely manner and pays attention to detail in complex factual and legal matters. Rachel has been described by clients as courteous, very personable and approachable.

Before coming to the Bar and joining 36 Civil, Rachel worked as a Legal and Finance Associate at Seneca Banking Consultants dealing primarily with claims against banks in the pre-litigation stage that engaged in the sale of Interest Rate Hedging products, Fixed Rate Tailored Business Loans, GRGs, Annuities and Currency Swaps. Rachel handled a case load of over 150 clients including premiership footballers, hoteliers, accountants, private residential and commercial landlords, private student halls of residence companies, private hospitals, farmers, car dealerships and private individuals.

Rachel is also direct access qualified.

Course Curriculum

Recorded Webinars

  • Webinar
    00:18:23

Supporting Documentation

  • Notes
    3 Page
  • Slides
    8 Page
  • Evaluation
    1 Page

reviews

  • No reviews found